Close Menu
  • News
  • Events
  • A&E
  • Dining
  • House & Home
  • Health & Beauty
  • Travel
  • Justa Coupla Guys
  • Issues
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Fox Valley Magazine
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Justa Coupla Guys
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Events
  • A&E
  • Dining
  • House & Home
  • Health & Beauty
  • Travel
  • Justa Coupla Guys
Fox Valley Magazine
Home » Flurry Of Last-Minute Activity Results In A Stay For The SAFE-T Act
News

Flurry Of Last-Minute Activity Results In A Stay For The SAFE-T Act

Fox Valley MagazineBy Fox Valley MagazineJanuary 1, 2023No Comments2 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


In a remarkable series of events, the controversial “no-cash bail” provisions of the SAFE-T Act, which were supposed to go into effect this morning, has been put on hold by the Illinois Supreme Court.

The Court granted an Emergency Motion for Supervisory Order filed jointly by Kane County State’s Attorney Jamie Mosser and DuPage County’s State’s Attorney Robert Berlin, which asked that the Court suspend implementation of the SAFE-T Act pending resolution of current litigation.

In their filing, Mosser and Berlin argued that, had the SAFE-T Act gone into effect on January 1, 2023, while litigation is pending, the administration of justice in Illinois would have been uneven, thus harming all the citizens of the State. Additionally, DuPage and Kane Counties, would have faced additional challenges as multiple municipalities are in multiple counties, some of which were bound by the pending litigation and others that were not.

The litigation is an aggregated suit brought by representatives of 62 counties in Illinois claiming that the Act is unconstitutional. (Kane, Cook, and DuPage counties did not participate in the suit.) Last week, the chief judge of the 21st Circuit Court in Kankakee, ruled that stripping judges of their authority to set bond requirements for suspects awaiting trial is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers between the judicial and legislative branches.

Cunnington based this assertion on the premise that courts have the “authority inherent power” to “administer and control their courtrooms and to set bail,” without interference from the legislative body. The SAFE-T Act, as passed and signed by Governor JB Pritzker, would usurp that inherent power.

On Monday, noting that the ruling would create uneven implementation of the law across the state’s 102 counties, Mosser and Berlin filed their Motion with the Illinois Supreme Court.

In a joint press release, Mosser and Berlin praised the Supreme Court’s ruling.

“We are very pleased with the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision. The equal administration of justice is paramount to the successful and fair administration of our criminal justice system. Today’s decision will ensure that those accused of a crime in Illinois will receive equal and fair treatment throughout the State.”



Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
Previous ArticleIgnored Stop Sign Results In Fatal Crash In Aurora
Next Article 2023 Ushers In A Slew Of New Laws
Advertisements

Related Posts

Update: Suspect ID’d Via Missing Person Report; Investigation Continues | Elgin: Armed Suspect Flees Police By Jumping In Fox River, Remains At Large

June 30, 2026

Chicago Man Gets 20 Years For Stabbing Girlfriend In Naperville Hotel Room

June 30, 2026

Out & About | The Pfister Hotel In Downtown Milwaukee

June 29, 2026

Update: After Two Days, Search Called Off | Elgin: Armed Suspect Flees Police By Jumping In Fox River, Remains At Large

June 28, 2026

Comments are closed.

© Fox Valley Magazine 2023. All Rights Reserved. Site by SDTECHNOLOGIES

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

×
Go to mobile version